Home | Electronic proposal submission | Proposal forms | Program committee recommendations

 

IRAM Program Committee Recommendations

The IRAM program committee convened in Grenoble on October 14 and 15 to discuss the proposals submitted for the winter 2004/2005 scheduling period . The committee was chaired by Mario Tafalla (Observatorio de Madrid). The principal investigators of each proposal will be informed by letter which will include comments issued by the committee if there are any. 

 

Plateau de Bure Interferometer Proposals

A total of 68 proposals were received for the interferometer. The programs were classified A (accepted), B (backup) and C (rejected). Programs rated A will be scheduled in priority. Further time, if it becomes available, will go to the B programs, taking into account scientific merit, crowding in certain right ascension ranges and general aspects of balance.

For projects rated A and B and without IRAM internal collaborator, please consult the list of local contacts.
 
 

A: Accepted, B: Backup, C: Rejected

Project
Rate
Project
Rate
Project
Rate
Project
Rate
Project
Rate
O02E
A
O02F
B
O030
C
O031
A
O032
B
O033
B
O034
B†
O035
C
O036
A
O037
C
O038
B†
O039
B
O03A
B
O03B
A
O03C
B†
O03D
_
O03E
C
O03F
C
O040
A†
O041
A
O042
A
O043
B
O044
A
O045
A†
O046
B
O047
C
O048
B
O049
A
O04A
C
O04B
B
O04C
C
O04D
B
O04E
A
O04F
B
O050
C
O051
C
O052
C
O053
A
O054
C
O055
B
O056
B†
O057
B
O058
C
O059
C
O05A
B
O05B
C
O05C
C
O05D
B
O05E
A
O05F
C
O060
A
O061
A
O062
C
O063
C
O064
C
O065
C
O066
A
O067
A
O068
A
O069
A
O06A
C
O06B
B
O06C
C
O06D
_
O06E
B
O06F
C
O070
A
O071
B
† : some parts of the program - others rated B or C

 

30m Proposals

135 proposals were received for the 30m telescope, requesting 4471 hours of telescope time. The highest rating "A" was given to 28 proposals ; 71 proposals were rated "B", i.e. were given backup status. The remaining proposals, although scientifically valuable in most cases, were rated "C". The individual ratings are listed in the attached table. All A-rated proposals will be scheduled on the telescope, although some with less time than requested. We expect that about half of the B-rated programs will actually be scheduled. The selection will take into account scientific merit, crowding in certain right ascension ranges, and general aspects of balance. Proposals rated "C'' will not get telescope time.

The principal investigators of each proposal will also be informed by letter which will include comments issued by the committee if there are any.

In addition to the 135 proposals submitted to the 30m telescope there were 6 interferometer proposals (247-04 - 252-04) requesting 30m time, mainly for the measurement of zero spacings. Naturally, the 30m part of these proposals received the same rating as the corresponding interferometer proposal, and no separate notification will be sent.

 

 


IRAM 30m telescope proposal ratings:   winter 2004/5

A

B

C

115-04 117-04 112-04 113-04 114-04 116-04 122-04
118-04 119-04 120-04 121-04 124-04 123-04 128-04
126-04 127-04 125-04 130-04 131-04 134-04 139-04
129-04 137-04 132-04 133-04 135-04 147-04 149-04
138-04 141-04 136-04 140-04 142-04 150-04 153-04
144-04 151-04 143-04 145-04 146-04 157-04 159-04
163-04 171-04 148-04 152-04 154-04 160-04 165-04
173-04 178-04 155-04 156-04 158-04 169-04 170-04
198-04 204-04 161-04 162-04 164-04 172-04 175-04
208-04 214-04 166-04 167-04 168-04 176-04 180-04
215-04 216-04 174-04 177-04 179-04 182-04 183-04
218-04 220-04 181-04 184-04 185-04 190-04 192-04
232-04 238-04 186-04 187-04 188-04 194-04 199-04
243-04 252-04 189-04 191-04 193-04 200-04 202-04
    195-04 196-04 197-04 203-04 206-04
    201-04 205-04 209-04 207-04 212-04
    210-04 211-04 213-04 217-04 224-04
    219-04 221-04 222-04 227-04 228-04
    223-04 225-04 226-04 235-04 236-04
    229-04 230-04 231-04 245-04 248-04
    233-04 234-04 237-04 249-04 250-04
    239-04 240-04 241-04    
    242-04 244-04 246-04    
    247-04 251-04      

 

 

 


Roberto NERI,   Clemens THUM
26 October 2004