[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1

To: alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu
Subject: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
From: Steve Scott <scott@ovro.caltech.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:54:11 -0700
References: <200108220058.f7M0wgZ03603@creek2.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu
Sender: owner-alma-sw-ssr@kochab.cv.nrao.edu

Excellent point. The requirement doesn't seem to reflect the Berkeley
discussion as I recall it. IMHO, commercial software should be an option
(even if it costs more than "nominal") unless, of course, the ASAC
mandates otherwise. It seems like there are quite a few options
available for smaller institutions, including reducing data remotely at
one of the regional data centers.

Steve

mel wright 456 wrote:
> 
> 2. A lot of people using IDL or matlab in preference
> to custom-built software. Should we re-visit OL-1.2-R6 ?
> 
> Melvyn

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
  - From: "Steven T. Myers" <smyers@nrao.edu>

References:
- Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
  - From: mel wright 456 <wright@astron.berkeley.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
Next by Date: [alma-sw-ssr] RE: Offline Requirements
Prev by thread: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
Next by thread: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread