Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1

["Steven T. Myers" <smyers@nrao.edu>]

The current req text reflects what I thought we had decided (though the
parenthetical Comment may not) - it is allowed, for nominal cost.  I would
say an IDL liscense as it stands is more than "nominal".  My experience
(with MATLAB and IDL) is that you take a tremendous performance hit
using these packages, one I doubt we can afford given the processing
requirements.  However, if it meets the benchmark specs (tbd) and the
rest then it would pass of course.

We may wish to dodge the question entirely by deleting this requirement
(OL-1.2-R6), though personally I think it is fine as-is.

On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Steve Scott wrote:

>
> Excellent point. The requirement doesn't seem to reflect the Berkeley
> discussion as I recall it. IMHO, commercial software should be an option
> (even if it costs more than "nominal") unless, of course, the ASAC
> mandates otherwise. It seems like there are quite a few options
> available for smaller institutions, including reducing data remotely at
> one of the regional data centers.
>
> Steve
>
>
> mel wright 456 wrote:
> >
> > 2. A lot of people using IDL or matlab in preference
> > to custom-built software. Should we re-visit OL-1.2-R6 ?
> >
> > Melvyn
>

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|:| Steven T. Myers                      |:|  Associate Scientist      |:|
|:| National Radio Astronomy Observatory |:|                           |:|
|:| P.O. Box O                           |:|  1003 Lopezville Rd.      |:|
|:| Socorro, NM 87801                    |:|  Ph:  (505) 835-7294      |:|
|:| smyers@nrao.edu                      |:|  FAX: (505) 835-7027      |:|
|:| http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/~smyers      |:|                           |:|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------