[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[alma-sw-ssr] Pipeline

To: alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu, <alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu>
Subject: [alma-sw-ssr] Pipeline
From: "K. Tatematsu" <k.tatematsu@nao.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:18:37 +0900
In-Reply-To: <027501c12a92$6c4668b0$bd015892@SHACKLETON>
Reply-To: alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu
Sender: owner-alma-sw-ssr@kochab.cv.nrao.edu

Dear all,

I felt that 2-0.0-R6 in pipeline
"A manual, interactive mode of operations shall be available ..."
may fit more to the offline.
How do you think?

Cheers,
Ken Tatematsu
__/______________________________/__/
Ken'ichi Tatematsu   http://alma.mtk.nao.ac.jp/~kt/
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan  __/__/
Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan                 __/
           __/__/__/__/__/__/________________/__/

Follow-Ups:
- [alma-sw-ssr] Re: Pipeline, sorry one more
  - From: "K. Tatematsu" <k.tatematsu@nao.ac.jp>

References:
- [alma-sw-ssr] Pipeline and offline comments
  - From: "Brian Glendenning" <bglenden@nrao.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Post-Berkeley draft of Offline Requirements
Next by Date: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] pipeline requirements
Prev by thread: [alma-sw-ssr] Pipeline and offline comments
Next by thread: [alma-sw-ssr] Re: Pipeline, sorry one more
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread