[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1

To: <alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu>
Subject: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
From: "Brian Glendenning" <bglenden@nrao.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:06:34 -0600
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10108220846100.2334-100000@water.tuc.nrao.edu> <3B83E59D.2F4FE6E7@ovro.caltech.edu>
Reply-To: alma-sw-ssr@nrao.edu
Sender: owner-alma-sw-ssr@kochab.cv.nrao.edu

I personally think "nominal cost to the user" is a reasonable user
requirement. However this could be accomplished by having ALMA buy the
licenses on behalf of the user, saving the development effort.

My $0.02 (is that a nominal cost?!)

Cheers,
Brian

References:
- Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
  - From: Mark Holdaway <mholdawa@nrao.edu>
- Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
  - From: Steve Scott <scott@ovro.caltech.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
Next by Date: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
Prev by thread: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
Next by thread: Re: [alma-sw-ssr] Offline Requirements v3.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread