Status of off-line analysis document review
(Steve Myers).
The document is officially handled to Brian, Gianni in order to start
the review process.
Current pipeline requirements draft (Frederic
Gueth, Peter Shilke).
A new draft was presented by Frederic and Peter. Every one is
asked to look at it in detail, in particular for omissions, in the
next two weeks. Then it will be included in a new version of Memo
11 by R. Lucas.
Actualisation of data rates
(S. Scott, S. Myers, M. Momose).
As proposed at the previous meeting, Steve, Steve and Munetake
have drafted a
technical note on a proposition of increasing the data
rates. The well-accepted science drivers on which ASAC has based
the proposition of a second generation correlator also call for an
increase of the peak rate by 20% and a doubling of the average data
rate. While it is well understood that the resulting increased cost
is probably not affordable in the current financial situation, is
is agreed that the new numbers should be included in a new version
of the Science requirements (note that this discussion concerns
only the computers and software limitations, not that of the
baseline correlator itself which is capable of simultaneous very
short dump times and large channel numbers ...). The note itself
will be posted in the web together with the previous version .
Proposed rewriting of selected requirements after
High Level Analysis Review (R. Lucas).
There is an agreement on all proposed changes. However
the proposition to keep the explicit reference to the
materialisation of observing procedures into text-editable scripts
is controversial (see the messages by Steve Scott and myself, as
well as the opinion of Boyd Waters). It is clear that this option
cannot be left to the software implementation process it
affects how ALMA will be able to handle smooth development and testing
of new observing modes. Please express your own opinion on the
mailing list on this point.
Archiving Requirements/Use Cases (Ken Tatematsu,
K. Nakanishi).
A new draft was presented by Ken. Every one is asked to look
at it in again, in the next two weeks. Then it will be included in
a new version of Memo 11 by R. Lucas.
Location and date of next face-to-face meeting: It is agreed that the next face-to-face meeting should take
place in Europe in February. The European members will propose a
location and possible dates.
Action List
Brian to start the review process for the off-line analysis
document.
All to send final comments to both Pipeline and Archive
requirement drafts, in the next two weeks.
All to express their opinions on the observing scripts issue.
R. Lucas to prepare an actualised version of memo 11
including the two new chapters and the proposed requirement changes.
$Id: 2001-12-04.html,v 1.5 2001/12/05 09:12:19 lucas Exp lucas $