Glendenning
Lucas
Mangum
Morita
Richer
Schilke
Schwarz
Scott
Shepherd
Testi
Viallefond
Wright
Minutes
Subsystem Scientist Activities (all)
Jeff Mangum -- Control ATF activities, as you are well aware. Quite a bit of relevant work
on real-time data acquisition and information flow on the VertexRSI
prototype antenna computing system.
John Richer -- Telescope Calibration My subsystem PS report is as last time - attended one telecon.
Peter Schilke -- Data Reduction User Interface Since based on the results of the PDR, the DRUI development has been
suspended, I have no activities to report. Please keep this activity
report for the next 20 or so telecons as well.
Steve Scott -- Correlator Reviewed PDR comments on atmospheric phase correction with respect to the
design document. In general the design seems correct, although some minor
clarifications were suggested.
Debra Shepherd -- Off-Line Analysis
Continue to work with Kumar Golap to develop a testing plan for the
Offline subsystem. During the week of 12may03, AIPS++ should provide
a list of what capabilities will be available by September so we can
finalize the offline development & testing plan.
Generalized the offline testing plan to include all subsystems.
Presented this draft to the ALMA Software Leads. Received written
comments from Gianni Raffi as well as comments from several people in
the meeting. I am now revising the testing plan to include their
comments.
Reviewed the benchmarking plan written by Raymond Rusk & Kumar Golap -
sent comments to Raymond; met with them to discuss how the SSR should
be involved in the benchmarking effort. This should be discussed and
agreed upon by the SSR this month.
Continued to test AIPS++ using high frequency, spectral line, fast
switching data from the VLA (an NH3 observation that is 4.2 GB in
size). Working with George Moellenbrock to resolve some issues on
applying the calibration from one frequency setup to another.
I've been talking with Bryan Glendenning about taking the ALMA SSR
staff position.
Leonardo Testi -- Observing Program Preparation The OT team had one telecon and one face to face meeting, which I attended
for 2 days. We discussed several items, including response to the PDR comments,
SimLite, Test Plan, the OT GUI and features for R1.0 in October. See also
the items posted for discussion.
Francois Viallefond -- Archive The Archive team had a telecon, May 7. Two items are closely
related with the SSR activity:
1/ There was a presentation of a first draft of an ALMA Science
Archive Requirements document. These requirements form a detailed
version of SSR requirements. The SSR will need to look at this
document when the archive subsystem group will be satisfied with it. I
am looking into it just now.
2/ Andreas is proposing that at least 3 reference observing
projects should be defined to be used as a reference for the
implementation of the various subsystems and also for the definition
of the XML schemata to be used throughout the data flow. This would
be an end-to-end approach starting from the details in the SBs to
perform the observations. In practice this requires to write use-cases
for few cases, these being driven by science goals. I'll work on this
with Andreas in the coming weeks.
Chris Wilson -- Pipeline (none so far)
Mel Wright -- Scheduling 1. I plan to
run my old dynamic scheduling program. with some ALMA atmospheric
data and a mix of observations, to answer some of the questions about
long/intermadiate term performance. Need to get an ascii file of
opacity and seeing versus time from alma site monitor.
2. Discussions with Allen about operational issues
for scheduling.
SSR Membership (R. Lucas)
As announced a few days ago by Brian, Debra Shepherd is now filling
the SSR "staff scientist" position at NRAO. She will continue as a
member of the SSR committee and as subsystem scientist for the
offline subsystem. We all welcome Debra in her new duties in the
SSR.
PDR Action List (R. Lucas)
A list of actions, following the PDR panel report and the response to
it by the computing IPT management (not yet released by the
project), will be circulated soon; some of its implications have
already discussed inside the computing subsystems.
Among them some involve the SSR, in particular the definition of
standard modes for interim science operations, and, at a later
stage, the implications of the Design Reference Mission (on which
the Science IPT is working) on the observing modes for interim
science. We will also have to work on auditing AIPS++ with respect to
the pipeline science requirements (one of them, performance, will
need some input from us), and on defining the AIPS++ benchmarks (not
new to this group).
We also note the proposition not to implement the SimLite at this
stage, and to the postponement of the DRUI by two years.
We support a full implementation of the automatic scheduler and the
need to really assess and monitor the performance of AIPS++, in
particular with respect to packages currently used with millimeter
instruments.
SimLite status (L. Testi)
(See Leodardo's message to the
list on Mon, 12 May). His advice is to postpone decision to
implement SimLite for about two years. At this time we can
reconsider whether there is a real need for a direct access to
simulation features inside the OT and at which level of
functionality. The full simulator may be actually sufficient if its
usability is satisfactory, even outside the OT. The proposition is
accepted by the SSR.
AIPS++ news (B. Glendenning)
Brian gave us a short report on AIPS++ project status: NRAO has
withdrawn fro the consortium, but will fully contribute to the ALMA
DRP, which has first priority, this will be based on AIPS++ classes
and on the planned new framework.
General Testing Plans (D. Shepherd)
Debra has generalized her testing plans to other subsystems than
the Off-Line (see last month's meeting). Her proposition has been
submitted to Computing management and Subsystem leads (you are
welcome to ask her for a copy). The actual way to put the plans into
application will obviously vary from subsystem to subsystem, as
e.g. some have prominent user interfaces, other more automatic
behavior. All input / contributions from Subsystem scientists will
be valuable there.
AIPS++ Benchmarking Plans (F. Viallefond, D. Shepherd)
Debra has recently
circulated the benchmarking plan of the OffLine subsystem
(document by K. Golap and R. Rusk). We need to propose the first
test cases (for 2003-08-22). The proposed ones are the PhaseIII data
set (GGTau extended to 64 antennas, to be compared with Gildas) and
VLA continuum & polarized emission in the gravitational lens
0957+561 at 6cm wavelength, to be compared with AIPS and (possibly)
MIRIAD. The SSR must provide these data along with reduction
procedures and scripts no later than mid-August. Benchmarking will
occur after each monthly stable release of AIPS++.
It was also proposed that a test mosaic data set be added to
the benchmark cases. As mosaicing is more complex (methods differ
in different packages), the inclusion of a mosaicing case will be
deferred for now. After the benchmark plan has been implemented and
the first several results have been posted on the web, the SSR will
evaluate the process and results and determine at that time whether
the mosaic data set should be included. Since releases are monthly,
the timescale for this process could be rather short if needed.
Date of next phone meeting
According to the schedule the following one will be on:
2003, June 11th 15:00 UT. We should also consider propositions
for the next face-to-face meeting (date and venue).
$Id: 2003-05-14.html,v 1.6 2003/05/14 17:48:59 lucas Exp lucas $