ALMA SSR Committee

Phone Meeting 2003-05-14


Connection Details


Attendance

Glendenning Lucas Mangum Morita Richer Schilke Schwarz Scott Shepherd Testi Viallefond Wright

Minutes



  1. Subsystem Scientist Activities (all)

  2. SSR Membership (R. Lucas) As announced a few days ago by Brian, Debra Shepherd is now filling the SSR "staff scientist" position at NRAO. She will continue as a member of the SSR committee and as subsystem scientist for the offline subsystem. We all welcome Debra in her new duties in the SSR.

  3. PDR Action List (R. Lucas) A list of actions, following the PDR panel report and the response to it by the computing IPT management (not yet released by the project), will be circulated soon; some of its implications have already discussed inside the computing subsystems. Among them some involve the SSR, in particular the definition of standard modes for interim science operations, and, at a later stage, the implications of the Design Reference Mission (on which the Science IPT is working) on the observing modes for interim science. We will also have to work on auditing AIPS++ with respect to the pipeline science requirements (one of them, performance, will need some input from us), and on defining the AIPS++ benchmarks (not new to this group). We also note the proposition not to implement the SimLite at this stage, and to the postponement of the DRUI by two years. We support a full implementation of the automatic scheduler and the need to really assess and monitor the performance of AIPS++, in particular with respect to packages currently used with millimeter instruments.

  4. SimLite status (L. Testi)
    (See Leodardo's message to the list on Mon, 12 May). His advice is to postpone decision to implement SimLite for about two years. At this time we can reconsider whether there is a real need for a direct access to simulation features inside the OT and at which level of functionality. The full simulator may be actually sufficient if its usability is satisfactory, even outside the OT. The proposition is accepted by the SSR.

  5. AIPS++ news (B. Glendenning)
    Brian gave us a short report on AIPS++ project status: NRAO has withdrawn fro the consortium, but will fully contribute to the ALMA DRP, which has first priority, this will be based on AIPS++ classes and on the planned new framework.

  6. General Testing Plans (D. Shepherd)
    Debra has generalized her testing plans to other subsystems than the Off-Line (see last month's meeting). Her proposition has been submitted to Computing management and Subsystem leads (you are welcome to ask her for a copy). The actual way to put the plans into application will obviously vary from subsystem to subsystem, as e.g. some have prominent user interfaces, other more automatic behavior. All input / contributions from Subsystem scientists will be valuable there.

  7. AIPS++ Benchmarking Plans (F. Viallefond, D. Shepherd)
    Debra has recently circulated the benchmarking plan of the OffLine subsystem (document by K. Golap and R. Rusk). We need to propose the first test cases (for 2003-08-22). The proposed ones are the PhaseIII data set (GGTau extended to 64 antennas, to be compared with Gildas) and VLA continuum & polarized emission in the gravitational lens 0957+561 at 6cm wavelength, to be compared with AIPS and (possibly) MIRIAD. The SSR must provide these data along with reduction procedures and scripts no later than mid-August. Benchmarking will occur after each monthly stable release of AIPS++.
    It was also proposed that a test mosaic data set be added to the benchmark cases. As mosaicing is more complex (methods differ in different packages), the inclusion of a mosaicing case will be deferred for now. After the benchmark plan has been implemented and the first several results have been posted on the web, the SSR will evaluate the process and results and determine at that time whether the mosaic data set should be included. Since releases are monthly, the timescale for this process could be rather short if needed.

  8. Date of next phone meeting According to the schedule the following one will be on: 2003, June 11th 15:00 UT. We should also consider propositions for the next face-to-face meeting (date and venue).

$Id: 2003-05-14.html,v 1.6 2003/05/14 17:48:59 lucas Exp lucas $